Enola gay smithsonian exhibit
The events sparked conversation about the atomic bombings and around the United States people discussed the events. Wallace, Mike, ‘Culture War, History Front’ in Linenthal, Edward T.
The Case of the Smithsonian Institution’s Enola Gay Exhibition’, The Journal of American History 82, no.
The Smithsonian wished to portray an accurate picture, even at the cost of exposing America?s not so innocent past. The Enola Gay exhibit was not exempt from the wrath of the newly appointed lawmakers. Scholars have noted, however, that the real issue at stake was a difference in the way America?s role in history was viewed. Each of these groups supported their own agendas however, they all centered their arguments on what they say as a lack of balance in the Smithsonian exhibit. Atomic bomb-Moral and ethical aspectsEnola Gay (Bomber)-Exhibitions-Political. In an attempt to portray the end of World War II, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the nuclear arms race, the National Air and Space Museum ran into great opposition from various military groups and certain members of Congress. Collected by historian Waldo Heinrichs, the Enola Gay Controversy. The immediate outcome of the Enola Gay controversy was the cancelling of the exhibit in January 1995.1 Smithsonian Secretary I. The controversy had broad implications for the field of history and the arena of American public consciousness. This paper examines the Smithsonian?Enola Gay controversy, an event which took place between 19.